FX-770K vs EPYC 7451

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7451
2017, $2,400
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
15.40
+737%

EPYC 7451 outperforms FX-770K by a whopping 737% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5862298
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.88no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency3.571.17
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date20 June 2017 (8 years ago)December 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,400no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC 7451 and FX-770K: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads484
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache2.25 MB256K
L2 cache12 MB4 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size213 mm2245 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors19200 Million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7451 and FX-770K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7451 and FX-770K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7451 and FX-770K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7451 and FX-770K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3-2133
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7451 and FX-770K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7451 15.40
+737%
FX-770K 1.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7451 26639
+738%
Samples: 8
FX-770K 3178
Samples: 83

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.40 1.84
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 48 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7451 has a 737% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FX-770K, on the other hand, has 177% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7451 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-770K in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7451 is a server/workstation processor while FX-770K is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate FX-770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7451 and FX-770K, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.