FX-770K vs A8-7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7600
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.08
+10.6%

A8-7600 outperforms FX-770K by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7600 and FX-770K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18091894
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.18no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date31 July 2014 (9 years ago)December 2014 (9 years ago)
Current price$66 $28

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-7600 and FX-770K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache256 KB256K
L2 cache4096 KB4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on A8-7600 and FX-770K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7600 and FX-770K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7600 and FX-770K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7600 and FX-770K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-2133
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7600 and FX-770K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7600 and FX-770K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7600 and FX-770K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7600 2.08
+10.6%
FX-770K 1.88

A8-7600 outperforms FX-770K by 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-7600 3217
+10.4%
FX-770K 2915

A8-7600 outperforms FX-770K by 10% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.08 1.88

The A8-7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-770K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7600 and FX-770K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7600
A8-7600
AMD FX-770K
FX-770K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 291 vote

Rate A8-7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate FX-770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7600 or FX-770K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.