Ryzen 7 PRO 250 vs EPYC 7443P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7443P outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 250 by a whopping 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 158 | 696 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 21.77 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Power efficiency | 17.28 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 15 March 2021 (4 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,337 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7443P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.85 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | 28.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | 4 nm |
| Die size | 4x 81 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 16,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7443P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 8 MB + 16 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7443P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7443P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7443P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7443P and Ryzen 7 PRO 250.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 32.23 | 12.34 |
| Recency | 15 March 2021 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 8 |
| Threads | 48 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 8 Watt |
EPYC 7443P has a 161.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Ryzen 7 PRO 250, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 2400% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 7443P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7443P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 250 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
