EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 7371

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
19.38
EPYC 75F3
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.13
+123%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms EPYC 7371 by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7371 and EPYC 75F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29652
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.576.31
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.7914.58
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date16 November 2018 (6 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,550$4,860

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 75F3 has 13% better value for money than EPYC 7371.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7371 and EPYC 75F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.95 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier3129.5
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size192 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7371 and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 75F3.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7371 19.38
EPYC 75F3 43.13
+123%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7371 30782
EPYC 75F3 68505
+123%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.38 43.13
Recency 16 November 2018 15 March 2021
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 32 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 7371 has 64.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 75F3, on the other hand, has a 122.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7371 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7371 and EPYC 75F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371
AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 12 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7371 or EPYC 75F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.