i5-13600KF vs EPYC 7371

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
19.38
Core i5-13600KF
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
23.80
+22.8%

Core i5-13600KF outperforms EPYC 7371 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7371 and Core i5-13600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking296215
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.6166.88
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Core i5
Power efficiency10.7312.38
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date13 November 2018 (6 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,550$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13600KF has 1092% better value for money than EPYC 7371.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7371 and Core i5-13600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads3220
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rateno data4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier3135
L1 cache1.5 MB768 KB
L2 cache8 MB8 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)6 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size213 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7371 and Core i5-13600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt125 W, 181 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7371 and Core i5-13600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7371 and Core i5-13600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7371 and Core i5-13600KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7371 and Core i5-13600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB192 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7371 and Core i5-13600KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7371 19.38
i5-13600KF 23.80
+22.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7371 30782
i5-13600KF 37805
+22.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.38 23.80
Recency 13 November 2018 27 September 2022
Physical cores 16 14
Threads 32 20
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 125 Watt

EPYC 7371 has 14.3% more physical cores and 60% more threads.

i5-13600KF, on the other hand, has a 22.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 60% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13600KF is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7371 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7371 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13600KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7371 and Core i5-13600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371
Intel Core i5-13600KF
Core i5-13600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 12 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1890 votes

Rate Core i5-13600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7371 or Core i5-13600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.