Xeon Silver 4210T vs EPYC 7352

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7352 and Xeon Silver 4210T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking199not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.31no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.51no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)no data
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,350no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7352 and Xeon Silver 4210T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads4820
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache128 MB (shared)13.75 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data91 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7352 and Xeon Silver 4210T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Silver 4210T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7352 and Xeon Silver 4210T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Silver 4210T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Silver 4210T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size4 TiB1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Silver 4210T.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2019 1 January 2020
Physical cores 24 10
Threads 48 20
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 95 Watt

EPYC 7352 has 140% more physical cores and 140% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Silver 4210T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 63.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7352 and Xeon Silver 4210T. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7352 and Xeon Silver 4210T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7352
EPYC 7352
Intel Xeon Silver 4210T
Xeon Silver 4210T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Silver 4210T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7352 or Xeon Silver 4210T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.