Ultra 7 265 vs EPYC 7352

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7352 and Core Ultra 7 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking195not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.76no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.41no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$1,350no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7352 and Core Ultra 7 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads4820
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache1.5 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm3 nm
Die size192 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7352 and Core Ultra 7 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR41851
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7352 and Core Ultra 7 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7352 and Core Ultra 7 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7352 and Core Ultra 7 265 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7352 and Core Ultra 7 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7352 and Core Ultra 7 265.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 24 20
Threads 48 20
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7352 has 20% more physical cores and 140% more threads.

Ultra 7 265, on the other hand, has a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 138.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7352 and Core Ultra 7 265. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7352 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7352 and Core Ultra 7 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7352
EPYC 7352
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Core Ultra 7 265

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 7 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7352 or Core Ultra 7 265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.