Processor U300 vs EPYC 7351
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7351 outperforms Processor U300 by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 664 | 1431 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.45 | 17.44 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | Intel Raptor Lake-U |
| Power efficiency | 3.29 | 14.06 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Naples (2017−2018) | Raptor Lake-U (2023) |
| Release date | 20 June 2017 (8 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,100 | $193 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Processor U300 has 612% better value for money than EPYC 7351.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 7351 and Processor U300: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 55 MHz |
| Multiplier | 24 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.5 MB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 19200 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7351 and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | TR4 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W, 170 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351 and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 7351 and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351 and Processor U300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351 and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 170.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351 and Processor U300.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.27 | 5.00 |
| Recency | 20 June 2017 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 5 |
| Threads | 32 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 7351 has a 165% higher aggregate performance score, and 220% more physical cores and 433% more threads.
Processor U300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 933% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 7351 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor U300 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7351 is a server/workstation processor while Processor U300 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
