EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 7313P

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7313P
2021
16 cores / 32 threads
27.18
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
78.96
+191%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7313P by 191% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7313P and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1524
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money17.1311.98
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Genoa
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$913$11,805
Current price$1581 (1.7x MSRP)$3975 (0.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7313P has 43% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Technical specs

EPYC 7313P and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)96
Threads32192
Base clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm, 6 nm
Die size4x 81 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors16,600 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7313P and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313P and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313P and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313P and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313P and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7313P 27.18
EPYC 9654 78.96
+191%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7313P by 191% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7313P 42032
EPYC 9654 122091
+190%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7313P by 190% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7313P 1342
EPYC 9654 1829
+36.3%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7313P by 36% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7313P 9200
EPYC 9654 18566
+102%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7313P by 102% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 27.18 78.96
Recency 15 March 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 16 96
Threads 32 192
Cost $913 $11805
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7313P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7313P and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7313P
EPYC 7313P
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7313P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7313P or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.