Apple M2 vs EPYC 7343

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7343
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 190 Watt
24.70
+192%

EPYC 7343 outperforms M2 by a whopping 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking254998
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.58no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency5.5317.98
DesignerAMDApple
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)no data
Release date15 March 2021 (4 years ago)10 June 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,565no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7343 and M2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.48 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)20 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors16,600 million20000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7343 and M2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt20 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7343 and M2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7343 and M2 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7343 and M2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7343 and M2.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7343 24.70
+192%
Apple M2 8.45

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7343 43644
+192%
Samples: 12
Apple M2 14933

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.70 8.45
Recency 15 March 2021 10 June 2022
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 20 Watt

EPYC 7343 has a 192.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Apple M2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7343 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M2 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7343 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7343
EPYC 7343
Apple M2
M2

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7343 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 741 votes

Rate M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7343 and M2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.