Apple M3 Pro 11-Core vs EPYC 7313

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7313
2021, $1,083
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
22.25
+56.6%
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
2023
11 cores / 11 threads, 27 Watt
14.21

EPYC 7313 outperforms M3 Pro 11-Core by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking311607
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.72no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M3
Power efficiency6.0622.21
DesignerAMDApple
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)no data
Release date15 March 2021 (5 years ago)30 October 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,083no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7313 and M3 Pro 11-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)11 (Undeca-Core)
Threads3211
Base clock speed3 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.06 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache128 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm+3 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors16,600 million37000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7313 and M3 Pro 11-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313 and M3 Pro 11-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313 and M3 Pro 11-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313 and M3 Pro 11-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313 and M3 Pro 11-Core.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7313 22.25
+56.6%
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 14.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7313 38938
+57%
Samples: 24
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 24798
Samples: 537

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.25 14.21
Recency 15 March 2021 30 October 2023
Physical cores 16 11
Threads 32 11
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 27 Watt

EPYC 7313 has a 57% higher aggregate performance score, and 45% more physical cores and 191% more threads.

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 474% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M3 Pro 11-Core in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M3 Pro 11-Core is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 32 votes

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 150 votes

Rate M3 Pro 11-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7313 and M3 Pro 11-Core, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.