Ryzen 7 7800X vs EPYC 7302P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 322 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 12.48 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | 12.65 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Zen 4 |
| Release date | 7 August 2019 (5 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $825 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 7 7800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 96 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 71+122 mm |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 7 7800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | TR4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 7 7800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 7 7800X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 7 7800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 120 Watt |
EPYC 7302P has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen 7 7800X, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 29.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7302P and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7302P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7800X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
