Xeon E7210 vs EPYC 7302
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 382 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 9.23 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.21 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2019−2020) | no data |
| Release date | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) | 1 July 2007 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $978 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7302 and Xeon E7210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 32 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | no data |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (per die) | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 4x 74 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 64 °C |
| Number of transistors | 15,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.0V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7302 and Xeon E7210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | PPGA604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302 and Xeon E7210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7302 and Xeon E7210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302 and Xeon E7210 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302 and Xeon E7210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302 and Xeon E7210.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 August 2019 | 1 July 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 80 Watt |
EPYC 7302 has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon E7210, on the other hand, has 94% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7302 and Intel Xeon E7210. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
