Xeon 6710E vs EPYC 7302

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7302
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
19.07
Xeon 6710E
2024
64 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
34.95
+83.3%

Xeon 6710E outperforms EPYC 7302 by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking340107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.2812.97
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency5.207.20
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (6 years ago)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$978$2,749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6710E has 26% better value for money than EPYC 7302.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302 and Xeon 6710E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4 MB (per module)
L3 cache32 MB (per die)96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size4x 74 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors15,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302 and Xeon 6710E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSP3FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302 and Xeon 6710E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7302 and Xeon 6710E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302 and Xeon 6710E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302 and Xeon 6710E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-6400
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302 and Xeon 6710E.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12888

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7302 19.07
Xeon 6710E 34.95
+83.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7302 Samples: 23 33511
Xeon 6710E Samples: 1 61404
+83.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.07 34.95
Recency 7 August 2019 3 June 2024
Physical cores 16 64
Threads 32 64
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 205 Watt

EPYC 7302 has 32.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6710E, on the other hand, has a 83.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6710E is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 7302 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302
EPYC 7302
Intel Xeon 6710E
Xeon 6710E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 55 votes

Rate EPYC 7302 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon 6710E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7302 and Xeon 6710E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.