Celeron 4305UE vs EPYC 7301

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7301
2017, $825
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
8.57
+784%
Celeron 4305UE
2018, $107
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.97

EPYC 7301 outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a whopping 784% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10492747
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.360.80
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency2.132.73
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date20 June 2017 (8 years ago)1 October 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7301 has 70% better value for money than Celeron 4305UE.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7301 and Celeron 4305UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads322
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7301 and Celeron 4305UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4Intel BGA 1528
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7301 and Celeron 4305UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7301 and Celeron 4305UE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7301 and Celeron 4305UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 610

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7301 and Celeron 4305UE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7301 8.57
+784%
Celeron 4305UE 0.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7301 14991
+782%
Samples: 2
Celeron 4305UE 1699
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.57 0.97
Recency 20 June 2017 1 October 2018
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 32 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7301 has a 784% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

Celeron 4305UE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 933% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7301 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7301 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 4305UE is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7301 and Celeron 4305UE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.