Xeon Platinum 8558P vs EPYC 72F3
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Platinum 8558P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 367 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.64 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.02 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| Release date | 15 March 2021 (3 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,468 | $6,759 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Platinum 8558P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 37 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 260 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 2x 763 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Platinum 8558P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | SP3 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Platinum 8558P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Platinum 8558P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Platinum 8558P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Platinum 8558P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC) |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Platinum 8558P.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 March 2021 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 48 |
| Threads | 16 | 96 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 350 Watt |
EPYC 72F3 has 94.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8558P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Platinum 8558P. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Platinum 8558P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
