Xeon Gold 6530 vs EPYC 72F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 72F3
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
17.62
Xeon Gold 6530
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
42.37
+140%

Xeon Gold 6530 outperforms EPYC 72F3 by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Gold 6530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking32948
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.15no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Emerald Rapids
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)1 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,468no data
Current price$4484 (1.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Gold 6530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)160 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+Intel 7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Gold 6530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Gold 6530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Gold 6530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Gold 6530 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Gold 6530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Gold 6530.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 72F3 17.62
Xeon Gold 6530 42.37
+140%

Xeon Gold 6530 outperforms EPYC 72F3 by 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 72F3 27252
Xeon Gold 6530 65533
+140%

Xeon Gold 6530 outperforms EPYC 72F3 by 140% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.62 42.37
Recency 15 March 2021 1 October 2023
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 16 64
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 270 Watt

The Xeon Gold 6530 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 72F3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 72F3 and Xeon Gold 6530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3
Intel Xeon Gold 6530
Xeon Gold 6530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 72F3 or Xeon Gold 6530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.