EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 7262

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7262
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 155 Watt
13.44
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
45.02
+235%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms EPYC 7262 by a whopping 235% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking51337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.0222.05
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years ago)18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$575no data
Current price$470 (0.8x MSRP)$1970

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7H12 has 38% better value for money than EPYC 7262.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads16128
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7262 13.44
EPYC 7H12 45.02
+235%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms EPYC 7262 by 235% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7262 20795
EPYC 7H12 69633
+235%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms EPYC 7262 by 235% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.44 45.02
Recency 7 August 2019 18 September 2019
Physical cores 8 64
Threads 16 128
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7262 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7262 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7262
EPYC 7262
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7262 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7262 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.