A4-7300 vs EPYC 7252

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7252
2019, $475
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
11.09
+1160%

EPYC 7252 outperforms A4-7300 by a whopping 1160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8442821
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.12no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency3.900.57
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date7 August 2019 (6 years ago)August 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$475no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC 7252 and A4-7300: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache32 MB (per die)no data
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm32 nm
Die size2x 74 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors7,600 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7252 and A4-7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketSP3FM2
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7252 and A4-7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7252 and A4-7300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7252 and A4-7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3-1600
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon HD 8470D
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data192
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7252 and A4-7300 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7252 and A4-7300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7252 and A4-7300.

PCIe version4.02.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7252 11.09
+1160%
A4-7300 0.88

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7252 18414
+1093%
Samples: 10
A4-7300 1543
Samples: 232

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.09 0.88
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7252 has a 1160% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 357% more advanced lithography process.

A4-7300, on the other hand, has 85% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7252 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4-7300 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7252 is a server/workstation processor while A4-7300 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 29 votes

Rate EPYC 7252 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 112 votes

Rate A4-7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7252 and A4-7300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.