Processor N200 vs EPYC 4345P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4345P outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 1421% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 262 | 2282 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 60.51 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Power efficiency | 34.77 | 24.76 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Grado (2025) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | 13 May 2025 (recently) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $193 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4345P and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 70.6 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,315 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4345P and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4345P and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 4345P and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4345P and Processor N200 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4345P and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4345P and Processor N200.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 23.43 | 1.54 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.92 | 3.18 |
| Recency | 13 May 2025 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
EPYC 4345P has a 1421.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
Processor N200, on the other hand, has 65.6% faster integrated GPU, and 983.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 4345P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N200 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 4345P is a server/workstation processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
