EPYC 4584PX vs Processor N200
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4584PX outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 2489% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Processor N200 and EPYC 4584PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2025 | 56 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Alder Lake-N | no data |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-N | Raphael |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Processor N200 and EPYC 4584PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 47 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,840 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Processor N200 and EPYC 4584PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and EPYC 4584PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Processor N200 and EPYC 4584PX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and EPYC 4584PX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and EPYC 4584PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and EPYC 4584PX.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 28 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.57 | 40.65 |
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 21 May 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 120 Watt |
The EPYC 4584PX is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Processor N200 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4584PX is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N200 and EPYC 4584PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
