Pentium 3825U vs EPYC 4245P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4245P outperforms Pentium 3825U by a whopping 2126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 424 | 2882 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 66.14 | 0.06 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Pentium |
| Power efficiency | 11.57 | 2.25 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Grado (2025) | Broadwell-U (2015) |
| Release date | 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago) | 1 March 2015 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $239 | $161 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 4245P has 110133% better value for money than Pentium 3825U.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4245P and Pentium 3825U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 70.6 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,315 million | 1300 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4245P and Pentium 3825U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | FCBGA1168 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4245P and Pentium 3825U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| FDI | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 4245P and Pentium 3825U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| OS Guard | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4245P and Pentium 3825U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4245P and Pentium 3825U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | Intel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel Processors |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 850 MHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 4245P and Pentium 3825U integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by EPYC 4245P and Pentium 3825U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 11.2/12 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4245P and Pentium 3825U.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 12 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.81 | 0.80 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.83 | 0.72 |
| Recency | 13 May 2025 | 1 March 2015 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 4245P has a 2126.3% higher aggregate performance score, 154.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium 3825U, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 4245P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 3825U in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 4245P is a server/workstation processor while Pentium 3825U is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
