EPYC 9135 vs E2-9010

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-9010
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.69
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+5199%

EPYC 9135 outperforms E2-9010 by a whopping 5199% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-9010 and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking272896
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency4.3617.31
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-9010 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size124.5 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on E2-9010 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFP4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count2no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-9010 and EPYC 9135 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 9135 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-9010 0.69
EPYC 9135 36.56
+5199%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-9010 1093
EPYC 9135 58070
+5213%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 36.56
Recency 1 June 2016 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 200 Watt

E2-9010 has 1900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 5198.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9010 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-9010 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9010 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9010
E2-9010
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 32 votes

Rate E2-9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9010 or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.