EPYC 74F3 vs E2-9010

Primary details

Comparing E2-9010 and EPYC 74F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2606	66
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	12.17
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	AMD Bristol Ridge	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Milan (2021)
Release date	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)	15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,900
Current price	$561	$2990 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

E2-9010 and EPYC 74F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads	2	48
Base clock speed	2 GHz	2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.2 GHz	4 GHz
L1 cache	no data	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	2048 KB	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	no data	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm+
Die size	124.5 mm2	4x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1200 Million	33,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on E2-9010 and EPYC 74F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	2
Socket	FP4	SP3
Power consumption (TDP)	10-15 Watt	240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 74F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,	no data
AES-NI	1	+
FMA	FMA4	no data
AVX	no data	+
PowerTune	-	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
PowerNow	-	no data
PowerGating	-	no data
Out-of-band client management	-	no data
VirusProtect	-	no data
RAID	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 74F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	+
IOMMU 2.0	-	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 74F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-1866	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	no data	4 TiB
Max memory channels	1	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics	N/A
iGPU core count	2	no data
Enduro	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data
UVD	+	no data
VCE	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-9010 and EPYC 74F3 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 74F3 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	1	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 74F3.

PCIe version	3.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	8	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 74F3 outperforms E2-9010 by 5424% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.71	39.22
Recency	1 June 2016	15 March 2021
Physical cores	2	24
Threads	2	48
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	240 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9010 and EPYC 74F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---