Ultra 7 265F vs E2-9010

VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-9010 and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2730not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency4.35no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

E2-9010 and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size124.5 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on E2-9010 and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP41851
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9010 and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

E2-9010 and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9010 and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9010 and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count2no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-9010 and Core Ultra 7 265F integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-9010 and Core Ultra 7 265F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9010 and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes820

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

E2-9010 has 550% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265F, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E2-9010 and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E2-9010 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9010 and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9010
E2-9010
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 32 votes

Rate E2-9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9010 or Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.