A10-4657M vs E2-9010
Aggregate performance score
A10-4657M outperforms E2-9010 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing E2-9010 and A10-4657M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2712 | 2395 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | AMD A-Series |
| Power efficiency | 4.33 | 3.00 |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 1 April 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E2-9010 and A10-4657M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 124.5 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1200 Million | 1303 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E2-9010 and A10-4657M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP4 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10-15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9010 and A10-4657M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Virtualization, | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | FMA4 | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9010 and A10-4657M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9010 and A10-4657M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-1866 | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 7660G |
| iGPU core count | 2 | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E2-9010 and A10-4657M integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E2-9010 and A10-4657M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9010 and A10-4657M.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.70 | 1.13 |
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 1 April 2013 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
E2-9010 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
A10-4657M, on the other hand, has a 61.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The A10-4657M is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9010 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9010 and A10-4657M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
