Ryzen 7 3700U vs E2-9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-9000
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.64
Ryzen 7 3700U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.63
+623%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by a whopping 623% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 3700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26691226
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Picasso-U (Zen+)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$78 $625

Detailed specifications

E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 3700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm12 nm
Die size124.5 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 3700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGAFP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 3700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization,DDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 3700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 3700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 3700U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-9000 0.64
Ryzen 7 3700U 4.63
+623%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 623% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E2-9000 983
Ryzen 7 3700U 7160
+628%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 628% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

E2-9000 1787
Ryzen 7 3700U 4411
+147%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 147% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E2-9000 2897
Ryzen 7 3700U 15461
+434%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 434% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E2-9000 1556
Ryzen 7 3700U 4595
+195%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 195% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

E2-9000 36.23
Ryzen 7 3700U 13.48
+169%

E2-9000 outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 169% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

E2-9000 1
Ryzen 7 3700U 8
+652%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 652% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

E2-9000 84
Ryzen 7 3700U 672
+700%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 700% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

E2-9000 47
Ryzen 7 3700U 139
+196%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 196% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E2-9000 0.59
Ryzen 7 3700U 1.59
+169%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 169% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-9000 0.7
Ryzen 7 3700U 3.8
+435%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 435% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-9000 744
Ryzen 7 3700U 2392
+222%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 222% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-9000 6
Ryzen 7 3700U 27
+330%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 330% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-9000 36
Ryzen 7 3700U 105
+194%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 194% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

E2-9000 2323
Ryzen 7 3700U 10238
+341%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 341% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

E2-9000 1430
Ryzen 7 3700U 3003
+110%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 110% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

E2-9000 2894
Ryzen 7 3700U 10025
+246%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 246% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

E2-9000 2371
Ryzen 7 3700U 9117
+285%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 285% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

E2-9000 1543
Ryzen 7 3700U 3247
+110%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms E2-9000 by 110% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 4.63
Integrated graphics card 1.03 4.24
Recency 1 June 2016 6 January 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 7 3700U is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 3700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9000
E2-9000
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Ryzen 7 3700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 304 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1379 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9000 or Ryzen 7 3700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.