Athlon II X3 425e vs E2-7110
Aggregate performance score
E2-7110 outperforms Athlon II X3 425e by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing E2-7110 and Athlon II X3 425e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2195 | 2219 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.09 | 2.97 |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo-L (2015) | Rana (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 7 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 3 May 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E2-7110 and Athlon II X3 425e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 3 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 169 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 930 Million | 300 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E2-7110 and Athlon II X3 425e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP4 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-7110 and Athlon II X3 425e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | FMA4 | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-7110 and Athlon II X3 425e are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-7110 and Athlon II X3 425e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3 |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E2-7110 and Athlon II X3 425e integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E2-7110 and Athlon II X3 425e integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-7110 and Athlon II X3 425e.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.44 | 1.41 |
| Recency | 7 May 2015 | 3 May 2011 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 3 |
| Threads | 4 | 3 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 45 Watt |
E2-7110 has a 2.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E2-7110 and Athlon II X3 425e.
Be aware that E2-7110 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X3 425e is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E2-7110 and Athlon II X3 425e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
