Pentium M 753 vs E2-6110
Aggregate performance score
E2-6110 outperforms Pentium M 753 by a whopping 689% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing E2-6110 and Pentium M 753 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2711 | 3392 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD E-Series | Pentium M |
| Power efficiency | 4.48 | 1.55 |
| Architecture codename | Beema (2014) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
E2-6110 and Pentium M 753 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E2-6110 and Pentium M 753 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FT3b | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-6110 and Pentium M 753. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | FMA4 | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-6110 and Pentium M 753 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-6110 and Pentium M 753. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E2-6110 and Pentium M 753 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E2-6110 and Pentium M 753 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-6110 and Pentium M 753.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.71 | 0.09 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 5 Watt |
E2-6110 has a 688.9% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium M 753, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.
The E2-6110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 753 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between E2-6110 and Pentium M 753, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
