Phenom II X4 650T vs E2-3800
Primary details
Comparing E2-3800 and Phenom II X4 650T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2693 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD A-Series | no data |
Power efficiency | 4.61 | no data |
Architecture codename | Kabini (2013−2014) | Zosma (2010−2011) |
Release date | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E2-3800 and Phenom II X4 650T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 346 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 904 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E2-3800 and Phenom II X4 650T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FT3 | AM3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3800 and Phenom II X4 650T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3800 and Phenom II X4 650T are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3800 and Phenom II X4 650T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR3 |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 8280 | no data |
จำนวนพาธไลน์ | 128 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E2-3800 and Phenom II X4 650T integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E2-3800 and Phenom II X4 650T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3800 and Phenom II X4 650T.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 23 May 2013 | 1 July 2011 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
E2-3800 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between E2-3800 and Phenom II X4 650T. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E2-3800 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X4 650T is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3800 and Phenom II X4 650T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.