A6-9210 vs E2-3800

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3800
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.73
A6-9210
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.79
+8.2%

A6-9210 outperforms E2-3800 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-3800 and A6-9210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26932634
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency4.614.98
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3800 and A6-9210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache2048 KB1024 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3800 and A6-9210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3FP4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3800 and A6-9210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXVirtualization,
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3800 and A6-9210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3800 and A6-9210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR4-2133
Max memory channels11

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8280AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3800 and A6-9210 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3800 and A6-9210 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3800 and A6-9210.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3800 0.73
A6-9210 0.79
+8.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3800 1152
A6-9210 1248
+8.3%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-3800 136
A6-9210 332
+144%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-3800 389
A6-9210 518
+33.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 0.79
Recency 23 May 2013 1 June 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

E2-3800 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A6-9210, on the other hand, has a 8.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 50% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E2-3800 and A6-9210.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3800 and A6-9210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3800
E2-3800
AMD A6-9210
A6-9210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 104 votes

Rate E2-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 151 vote

Rate A6-9210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3800 or A6-9210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.