Turion 64 ML-28 vs E2-3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3000M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.38
+153%

E2-3000M outperforms Turion 64 ML-28 by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33123616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesTurion 64
Power efficiency0.460.18
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date20 December 2011 (14 years ago)June 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3000M and Turion 64 ML-28 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size228 mm2125 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000M and Turion 64 ML-28 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1754
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000M and Turion 64 ML-28. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.1/2, 3DNow, Radeon HD 6380Gno data
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000M and Turion 64 ML-28 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000M and Turion 64 ML-28. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6380Gno data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E2-3000M 0.38
+153%
Turion 64 ML-28 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E2-3000M 668
+163%
Samples: 116
Turion 64 ML-28 254

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E2-3000M 1597
+33%
Turion 64 ML-28 1201

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 0.15
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm

E2-3000M has a 153% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 181% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD E2-3000M is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 ML-28 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 56 votes

Rate E2-3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-28 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E2-3000M and Turion 64 ML-28, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.