i3-330UM vs E2-3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A4-3300M A4-3305M A4-3310MX A6-3400M A6-3410MX A6-3420M A6-3430MX A8-3500M A8-3510MX A8-3520M A8-3530MX E2-3000M
VS
Core i3-330M Core i3-350M Core i3-370M Core i3-380M Core i5-430M Core i5-460M Core i5-480M Core i5-520M Core i5-560M Core i7-620M Core i7-640M Pentium P6200

Aggregate performance score

E2-3000M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
+20%
Core i3-330UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.35

E2-3000M outperforms Core i3-330UM by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

E2-3000M E2-3000M
i3-330UM i3-330UM

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000M and Core i3-330UM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29703047
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Core i3
Power efficiency1.141.84
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date20 December 2011 (12 years ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3000M and Core i3-330UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data9
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB3 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size228 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000M and Core i3-330UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFS1BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000M and Core i3-330UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.1/2, 3DNow, Radeon HD 6380GIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

E2-3000M and Core i3-330UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000M and Core i3-330UM are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000M and Core i3-330UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6380GIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3000M and Core i3-330UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3000M and Core i3-330UM.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3000M 0.42
+20%
i3-330UM 0.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3000M 668
+20.4%
i3-330UM 555

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-3000M 231
+22.2%
i3-330UM 189

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-3000M 426
+0.9%
i3-330UM 422

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E2-3000M 1597
+23.1%
i3-330UM 1297

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E2-3000M 3014
+1.1%
i3-330UM 2982

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.42 0.35
Recency 20 December 2011 24 May 2010
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

E2-3000M has a 20% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

i3-330UM, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

The E2-3000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-330UM in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000M and Core i3-330UM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD E2-3000M
E2-3000M
Intel Core i3-330UM
Core i3-330UM
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

E2-3000M E2 3000M
vs
A4-3320M A4 3320M
i3-330UM Core i3 330UM
vs
Core 2 Duo SU7300 Core 2 Duo SU7300
E2-3000M E2 3000M
vs
Athlon II M300 Athlon II M300
Core 2 Duo T6570 Core 2 Duo T6570
vs
E2-3000M E2 3000M
Core 2 Duo T5850 Core 2 Duo T5850
vs
E2-3000M E2 3000M
Core 2 Duo SL9400 Core 2 Duo SL9400
vs
E2-3000M E2 3000M
E2-3000M E2 3000M
vs
Celeron Dual-Core T3300 Celeron Dual Core T3300
E2-3000M E2 3000M
vs
Core 2 Duo T5600 Core 2 Duo T5600
i7-2715QE Core i7 2715QE
vs
E2-3000M E2 3000M
E2-3000M E2 3000M
vs
i3-8109U Core i3 8109U
E2-3000M E2 3000M
vs
Pentium Gold 5405U Pentium Gold 5405U
E2-3000M E2 3000M
vs
i3-10110U Core i3 10110U
E2-3000M E2 3000M
vs
Celeron T3300 Celeron T3300

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 54 votes

Rate E2-3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 7 votes

Rate Core i3-330UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000M or Core i3-330UM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.