Apple M1 Pro 8-Core vs E2-3000M
Aggregate performance score
M1 Pro 8-Core outperforms E2-3000M by a whopping 2487% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3312 | 952 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD E-Series | Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 0.46 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Apple |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | no data |
| Release date | 20 December 2011 (14 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of E2-3000M and M1 Pro 8-Core: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 2.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 33700 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on E2-3000M and M1 Pro 8-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FS1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | W |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000M and M1 Pro 8-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE4.1/2, 3DNow, Radeon HD 6380G | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000M and M1 Pro 8-Core are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000M and M1 Pro 8-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6380G | Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU ( - 1296 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.38 | 9.83 |
| Recency | 20 December 2011 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core has a 2487% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M1 Pro 8-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E2-3000M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
