E1-6010 vs E2-2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-2000 and E1-6010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameZacate (2010−2013)Beema (2014)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-2000 and E1-6010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.75 GHz1.35 GHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography40 nm28 nm
Die size75 mm2107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-2000 and E1-6010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFT3b
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-2000 and E1-6010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow++
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-2000 and E1-6010 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-2000 and E1-6010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7340AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-2000 and E1-6010 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-2000 and E1-6010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-2000 and E1-6010.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-2000 496
E1-6010 535
+7.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-2000 144
+12.5%
E1-6010 128

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-2000 270
+22.2%
E1-6010 221

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2013 29 April 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 10 Watt

E1-6010 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E2-2000 and E1-6010. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-2000 and E1-6010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-2000
E2-2000
AMD E1-6010
E1-6010

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 55 votes

Rate E2-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 542 votes

Rate E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-2000 or E1-6010, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.