FX-6330 vs E2-1800

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-1800
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.28
FX-6330
2015
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.79
+896%

FX-6330 outperforms E2-1800 by a whopping 896% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-1800 and FX-6330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31171678
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.472.11
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)15 December 2015 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-1800 and FX-6330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)288 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm32 nm
Die size75 mm2315 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-1800 and FX-6330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallAM3+
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-1800 and FX-6330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-1800 and FX-6330 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-1800 and FX-6330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7340On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-1800 and FX-6330.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-1800 0.28
FX-6330 2.79
+896%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-1800 449
FX-6330 4433
+887%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 2.79
Recency 6 June 2012 15 December 2015
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 6
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 125 Watt

E2-1800 has 594.4% lower power consumption.

FX-6330, on the other hand, has a 896.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-6330 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-1800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-1800 and FX-6330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-1800
E2-1800
AMD FX-6330
FX-6330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 166 votes

Rate E2-1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 39 votes

Rate FX-6330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-1800 or FX-6330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.