C-70 vs E2-1800

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-1800
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.28
+40%

E2-1800 outperforms C-70 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-1800 and C-70 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31323236
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD C-Series
Power efficiency1.472.10
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)1 September 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-1800 and C-70 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.33 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm40 nm
Die size75 mm275 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-1800 and C-70 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-1800 and C-70. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-1800 and C-70 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-1800 and C-70. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7340AMD Radeon HD 6290 (280 - 400 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-1800 0.28
+40%
C-70 0.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-1800 449
+42.5%
C-70 315

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-1800 108
+9.1%
C-70 99

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-1800 181
+5.8%
C-70 171

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E2-1800 1110
+39.1%
C-70 798

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E2-1800 2121
+41.9%
C-70 1495

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

E2-1800 1083
+38.4%
C-70 782

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E2-1800 69.05
+42.2%
C-70 98.2

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

E2-1800 1
+73%
C-70 0

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

E2-1800 0.33
+43.5%
C-70 0.23

Geekbench 2

E2-1800 1781
+41.7%
C-70 1257

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 0.20
Integrated graphics card 0.40 0.27
Recency 6 June 2012 1 September 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 9 Watt

E2-1800 has a 40% higher aggregate performance score, and 48.1% faster integrated GPU.

C-70, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 100% lower power consumption.

The E2-1800 is our recommended choice as it beats the C-70 in performance tests.

Note that E2-1800 is a desktop processor while C-70 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-1800 and C-70, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-1800
E2-1800
AMD C-70
C-70

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 166 votes

Rate E2-1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 96 votes

Rate C-70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-1800 or C-70, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.