Atom D510 vs E2-1800

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-1800
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.28
+7.7%
Atom D510
2009
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.26

E2-1800 outperforms Atom D510 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-1800 and Atom D510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31323159
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.471.89
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)21 December 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$97

Detailed specifications

E2-1800 and Atom D510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.67 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm45 nm
Die size75 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-1800 and Atom D510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-1800 and Atom D510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit

Security technologies

E2-1800 and Atom D510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-1800 and Atom D510 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-1800 and Atom D510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7340On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-1800 0.28
+7.7%
Atom D510 0.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-1800 449
+10.6%
Atom D510 406

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 0.26
Recency 6 June 2012 21 December 2009
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 40 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 13 Watt

E2-1800 has a 7.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D510, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 38.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E2-1800 and Atom D510.

Note that E2-1800 is a desktop processor while Atom D510 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-1800 and Atom D510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-1800
E2-1800
Intel Atom D510
Atom D510

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 166 votes

Rate E2-1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 52 votes

Rate Atom D510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-1800 or Atom D510, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.