A4-3400 vs E2-1800

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-1800
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.28
A4-3400
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.68
+143%

A4-3400 outperforms E2-1800 by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-1800 and A4-3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31482750
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.481.00
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)7 September 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-1800 and A4-3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm32 nm
Die size75 mm2228 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-1800 and A4-3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFM1
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-1800 and A4-3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-1800 and A4-3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-1800 and A4-3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7340Radeon HD 6410D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-1800 0.28
A4-3400 0.68
+143%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-1800 446
A4-3400 1089
+144%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-1800 109
A4-3400 289
+165%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-1800 184
A4-3400 485
+164%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 0.68
Recency 6 June 2012 7 September 2011
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 65 Watt

E2-1800 has an age advantage of 8 months, and 261.1% lower power consumption.

A4-3400, on the other hand, has a 142.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The A4-3400 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-1800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-1800 and A4-3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-1800
E2-1800
AMD A4-3400
A4-3400

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 179 votes

Rate E2-1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 83 votes

Rate A4-3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-1800 or A4-3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.