Phenom X3 8550 vs E1-7010

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-7010
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.35
Phenom X3 8550
2008
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
0.65
+85.7%

Phenom X3 8550 outperforms E1-7010 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32902959
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.490.29
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Toliman (2008)
Release date7 May 2015 (10 years ago)April 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

E1-7010 and Phenom X3 8550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads23
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data285 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-7010 and Phenom X3 8550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and Phenom X3 8550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and Phenom X3 8550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and Phenom X3 8550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and Phenom X3 8550 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-7010 and Phenom X3 8550 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and Phenom X3 8550.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E1-7010 0.35
Phenom X3 8550 0.65
+85.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E1-7010 613
Samples: 109
Phenom X3 8550 1151
+87.8%
Samples: 76

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.65
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 2 3
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 95 Watt

E1-7010 has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

Phenom X3 8550, on the other hand, has a 85.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The AMD Phenom X3 8550 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E1-7010 in performance tests.

Be aware that E1-7010 is a notebook processor while Phenom X3 8550 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-7010
E1-7010
AMD Phenom X3 8550
Phenom X3 8550

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 233 votes

Rate E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 12 votes

Rate Phenom X3 8550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E1-7010 and Phenom X3 8550, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.