AMD E1-6010 vs E1-7010

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

Comparing E1-7010 and E1-6010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Beema (2014)
Release date7 May 2015 (8 years old)29 April 2014 (9 years old)
Current priceno data$314

Technical specs

E1-7010 and E1-6010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.35 GHz
L2 cache1024 KB1024 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E1-7010 and E1-6010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and E1-6010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1333
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVX++
PowerTune--
TrueAudio--
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management--
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and E1-6010 are enumerated here.

AMD-V11
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and E1-6010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR3
Max memory channels11

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 GraphicsAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro++
Switchable graphics11
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and E1-6010 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-7010 and E1-6010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and E1-6010.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E1-7010 592
+10.7%
E1-6010 535

E1-7010 outperforms E1-6010 by 11% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E1-7010 136
+7.9%
E1-6010 126

E1-7010 outperforms E1-6010 by 8% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E1-7010 223
+2.3%
E1-6010 218

E1-7010 outperforms E1-6010 by 2% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 7 May 2015 29 April 2014

We couldn't decide between E1-7010 and E1-6010. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-7010 and E1-6010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-7010
E1-7010
AMD E1-6010
E1-6010

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 202 votes

Rate AMD E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 505 votes

Rate AMD E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-7010 or E1-6010, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.