Intel Celeron N2840 vs AMD E1-6010

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 314$
Games supported 10%
AMD E1-6010
AMD E1-6010
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Intel Celeron N2840
Intel Celeron N2840
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 287$
Games supported 10%

General info

Comparing E1-6010 and Celeron N2840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ratingnot ratednot rated
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date29 April 2014
(8 years old)
22 May 2014
(8 years old)
Current price$314 $287

Technical specs

E1-6010 and Celeron N2840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed1.35 GHz2.58 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierno data-

Compatibility

Information on E1-6010 and Celeron N2840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bFCBGA1170
Thermal design power (TDP)10 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-6010 and Celeron N2840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1333no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4no data
AVX+no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+

Security technologies

E1-6010 and Celeron N2840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-6010 and Celeron N2840 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-6010 and Celeron N2840. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.32 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 Graphics-
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics1-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-6010 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-6010 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12-
Vulkan1-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-6010 and Celeron N2840.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
  • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
  • 3DMark06 CPU
  • Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
  • Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
  • Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 67%

E1-6010 529
Celeron N2840 583
+10.2%

Celeron N2840 outperforms E1-6010 by 10% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

E1-6010 138
Celeron N2840 213
+54.3%

Celeron N2840 outperforms E1-6010 by 54% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

E1-6010 248
Celeron N2840 379
+52.8%

Celeron N2840 outperforms E1-6010 by 53% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

E1-6010 1006
Celeron N2840 1331
+32.4%

Celeron N2840 outperforms E1-6010 by 32% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E1-6010 1784
Celeron N2840 2533
+42%

Celeron N2840 outperforms E1-6010 by 42% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E1-6010 927
Celeron N2840 1510
+62.9%

Celeron N2840 outperforms E1-6010 by 63% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

E1-6010 1
Celeron N2840 1
+50.8%

Celeron N2840 outperforms E1-6010 by 51% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E1-6010 49
Celeron N2840 76
+55.1%

Celeron N2840 outperforms E1-6010 by 55% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E1-6010 25
Celeron N2840 38
+52%

Celeron N2840 outperforms E1-6010 by 52% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E1-6010 0.3
Celeron N2840 0.4
+33.3%

Celeron N2840 outperforms E1-6010 by 33% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

E1-6010 1324
Celeron N2840 1688
+27.5%

Celeron N2840 outperforms E1-6010 by 27% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

E1-6010 760
Celeron N2840 957
+25.9%

Celeron N2840 outperforms E1-6010 by 26% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Advantages and disadvantages


Boost clock speed 1350 2580
Base clock speed 0 2160
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 10 Watt 7 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

AMD E1-6010
E1-6010

and

Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840

We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-6010 and Celeron N2840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.


Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User rating

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 307 ratings

Rate AMD E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 263 ratings

Rate Intel Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-6010 or Celeron N2840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.