C-50 vs E1-6010

VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-6010
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.34
+113%

E1-6010 outperforms C-50 by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E1-6010 and C-50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30803287
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD C-Series
Power efficiency3.221.68
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-6010 and C-50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.35 GHz1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm40 nm
Die size107 mm275 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-6010 and C-50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3bFT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-6010 and C-50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-6010 and C-50 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-6010 and C-50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 6250
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-6010 and C-50 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-6010 and C-50 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-6010 and C-50.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-6010 0.34
+113%
C-50 0.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-6010 534
+105%
C-50 261

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E1-6010 128
+80.3%
C-50 71

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E1-6010 219
+76.6%
C-50 124

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E1-6010 1006
+52.1%
C-50 661

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E1-6010 1784
+39.2%
C-50 1282

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

E1-6010 927
+45.9%
C-50 636

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E1-6010 95.8
+16.1%
C-50 111.2

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

E1-6010 1
+55.3%
C-50 0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.16
Recency 29 April 2014 4 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 9 Watt

E1-6010 has a 112.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

C-50, on the other hand, has 11.1% lower power consumption.

The E1-6010 is our recommended choice as it beats the C-50 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-6010 and C-50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-6010
E1-6010
AMD C-50
C-50

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 562 votes

Rate E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 269 votes

Rate C-50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-6010 or C-50, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.