C-50 vs E1-2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-2100
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
0.25
+56.3%

E1-2100 outperforms C-50 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E1-2100 and C-50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31633294
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD C-Series
Power efficiency2.651.69
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-2100 and C-50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1 GHz1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm40 nm
Die size246 mm275 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-2100 and C-50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-2100 and C-50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, BMI1, ABM, SVM, AES-NIMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-2100 and C-50 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-2100 and C-50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8210AMD Radeon HD 6250
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-2100 and C-50 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-2100 and C-50 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-2100 and C-50.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-2100 0.25
+56.3%
C-50 0.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-2100 407
+55.9%
C-50 261

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E1-2100 95
+33.8%
C-50 71

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E1-2100 164
+32.3%
C-50 124

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E1-2100 765
+15.7%
C-50 661

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E1-2100 1435
+12%
C-50 1282

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

E1-2100 772
+21.5%
C-50 636

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E1-2100 106.95
+4%
C-50 111.2

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

E1-2100 0
+23.7%
C-50 0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 0.16
Integrated graphics card 0.49 0.24
Recency 23 May 2013 4 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

E1-2100 has a 56.3% higher aggregate performance score, 104.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The E1-2100 is our recommended choice as it beats the C-50 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-2100 and C-50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-2100
E1-2100
AMD C-50
C-50

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 321 vote

Rate E1-2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 269 votes

Rate C-50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-2100 or C-50, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.