Microsoft SQ1 vs E1-2200

VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-2200
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
0.30
Microsoft SQ1
2019
8 cores / 8 threads
3.73
+1143%

Microsoft SQ1 outperforms E1-2200 by a whopping 1143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E1-2200 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31171488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
Power efficiency3.15no data
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)
Release date5 November 2013 (11 years ago)2 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-2200 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Boost clock speed1.05 GHz3 GHz
L2 cache1024 KBno data
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-2200 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3no data
Power consumption (TDP)9 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-2200 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-2200 and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-2200 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8210Qualcomm Adreno 685
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-2200 and Microsoft SQ1 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-2200 and Microsoft SQ1 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-2200 and Microsoft SQ1.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-2200 0.30
Microsoft SQ1 3.73
+1143%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-2200 474
Microsoft SQ1 5918
+1149%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 3.73
Recency 5 November 2013 2 October 2019
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

Microsoft SQ1 has a 1143.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Microsoft SQ1 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-2200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-2200 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-2200
E1-2200
Microsoft SQ1
SQ1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate E1-2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 58 votes

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-2200 or Microsoft SQ1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.