Celeron M 925 vs E1-1200

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-1200 and Celeron M 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Celeron M
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date6 June 2012 (11 years ago)1 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$70
Current price$74 $51 (0.7x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

E1-1200 and Celeron M 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography40 nm45 nm
Die size75 mm2107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E1-1200 and Celeron M 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1200 and Celeron M 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4Ano data
PowerNow+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1200 and Celeron M 925 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1200 and Celeron M 925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7310no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 1 January 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 40 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between E1-1200 and Celeron M 925. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-1200 and Celeron M 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-1200
E1-1200
Intel Celeron M 925
Celeron M 925

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 245 votes

Rate E1-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-1200 or Celeron M 925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.