Sempron 140 vs E-350
Aggregate performance score
Sempron 140 outperforms E-350 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing E-350 and Sempron 140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3147 | 3109 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.42 | 0.65 |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Sargas (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 22 July 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $40 |
Detailed specifications
E-350 and Sempron 140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 117 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 234 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E-350 and Sempron 140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Sempron 140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Sempron 140 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Sempron 140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and Sempron 140.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.27 | 0.31 |
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 22 July 2009 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 45 Watt |
E-350 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.
Sempron 140, on the other hand, has a 14.8% higher aggregate performance score.
The Sempron 140 is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.
Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while Sempron 140 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and Sempron 140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
