A6-9220e vs E-350

VS

Aggregate performance score

E-350
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.27
A6-9220e
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.61
+126%

A6-9220e outperforms E-350 by a whopping 126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and A6-9220e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31472799
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.429.62
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-350 and A6-9220e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography40 nm28 nm
Die size75 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and A6-9220e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1BGA
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and A6-9220e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4AVirtualization,

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and A6-9220e are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and A6-9220e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6310AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E-350 0.27
A6-9220e 0.61
+126%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-350 422
A6-9220e 970
+130%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E-350 1049
A6-9220e 1056
+0.7%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E-350 2005
+15.2%
A6-9220e 1741

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E-350 68.8
A6-9220e 35.2
+95.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 0.61
Integrated graphics card 0.32 1.17
Recency 4 January 2011 1 June 2017
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 6 Watt

A6-9220e has a 125.9% higher aggregate performance score, 265.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The A6-9220e is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and A6-9220e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
AMD A6-9220e
A6-9220e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 396 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 316 votes

Rate A6-9220e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-350 or A6-9220e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.