Ryzen 5 7535U vs E-300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E-300
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.21
Ryzen 5 7535U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
10.71
+5000%

Ryzen 5 7535U outperforms E-300 by a whopping 5000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-300 and Ryzen 5 7535U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3207731
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.1036.20
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Rembrandt-R (2023)
Release date22 August 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

E-300 and Ryzen 5 7535U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz4.55 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm6 nm
Die size75 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E-300 and Ryzen 5 7535U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1FP7
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-300 and Ryzen 5 7535U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVMXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-300 and Ryzen 5 7535U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-300 and Ryzen 5 7535U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6310AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-300 and Ryzen 5 7535U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E-300 0.21
Ryzen 5 7535U 10.71
+5000%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-300 340
Ryzen 5 7535U 17011
+4903%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E-300 88
Ryzen 5 7535U 1752
+1891%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E-300 152
Ryzen 5 7535U 6602
+4243%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E-300 853
Ryzen 5 7535U 5785
+578%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E-300 1176
Ryzen 5 7535U 30692
+2510%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

E-300 839
Ryzen 5 7535U 10822
+1191%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E-300 79
Ryzen 5 7535U 13.19
+499%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

E-300 0
Ryzen 5 7535U 16
+3323%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

E-300 0.25
Ryzen 5 7535U 2.54
+916%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 10.71
Integrated graphics card 0.32 16.31
Recency 22 August 2011 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 28 Watt

E-300 has 55.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 7535U, on the other hand, has a 5000% higher aggregate performance score, 4996.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 7535U is our recommended choice as it beats the E-300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-300 and Ryzen 5 7535U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-300
E-300
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U
Ryzen 5 7535U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 303 votes

Rate E-300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 79 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-300 or Ryzen 5 7535U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.