Ryzen 3 5300G vs E-240
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms E-240 by a whopping 6673% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3675 | 1175 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD E-Series | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | 0.26 | 4.84 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Cezanne (2021−2025) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (15 years ago) | 13 April 2021 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E-240 and Ryzen 3 5300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 40 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on E-240 and Ryzen 3 5300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-240 and Ryzen 3 5300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-240 and Ryzen 3 5300G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-240 and Ryzen 3 5300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | AMD Radeon Vega 6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-240 and Ryzen 3 5300G.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.11 | 7.45 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.29 | 2.80 |
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 13 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
E-240 has 261% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 5300G, on the other hand, has a 6673% higher aggregate performance score, 866% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen 3 5300G is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E-240 in performance tests.
Be aware that E-240 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 5300G is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
